Debate video compilations

The God Debate II: Harris vs. Craig
Posted by: NDdotEDU

Video duration: 7615 seconds
Global video hits: 320797

The second annual God Debate features atheist neuroscientist Sam Harris and Evangelical Christian apologist William Lane Craig as they debate the topic: "Is Good From God?" The debate was sponsored in large part by the Notre Dame College of Arts and Letters: The Henkels Lecturer Series, The Center for Philosophy of Religion and the Institute for Scholarship in the Liberal Arts.

Related: god, debate, atheist, christian, good, christianity, creationism, religion, spirituality

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Is? there any ...
By: curiosityversusfaith. on 14 May 12, 13:50:31
Is? there any evidence for a God who is good? No, there isn't any. Actually, if he really existed then he'd be rather evil, because he obviously does not care about all the suffering by not doing anything against tsunamis, earthquakes, famines, deseases, ... The basis of our well-being is always we ourselves and our needs. We do exist - no question, and by that ethical standards do exist and are empowered. Poor USA - still being stuck in debating objective morals (of an imaginary God)!

I think the real ...
By: Jinu126. on 11 May 12, 18:35:20
I think the real problem here is the difference in the goals between atheism and Christianity. Christianity's basis for morality being that God is good, knows what is good, and the goal is to believe in him. Atheism, on the other hand, as Harris is suggesting, I think avoids the subjectivity of the morality of an act (is something truly wrong or truly? right) and focuses on the goal that he explains as a state of best well-being. These differences being different 'definitions' of morality.

What is GOD ? ...
By: netelsg. on 11 May 12, 07:28:55
What is GOD ? Bible : John 4:24 "... God is a Spirit... John 10:34 "Jesus answered them, “Is it not written in your Law, ‘I have said? you are gods’?" Psalm 82:6 I said, "You are gods, And all of you are sons of the Most High."

Keep in mind that ...
By: TrippDaly. on 09 May 12, 18:16:29
Keep in mind that you are not the target audience of this debate. Dr. Craig and Dr. Harris are extremely intelligent individuals that are speaking to what I would assume is an extremely intelligent audience in the subject matter of philosophy and theology. I believe it would be a mistake to assume that Dr. Craig is using? "big" words to make himself appear smarter.

I feel like Craig ...
By: Astrogod07. on 08 May 12, 16:51:47
I feel like Craig tries to make arguments in some kind of philosophical pseudo-language and tries to squeeze in as many big words as possible. Now, I actually usually prefer high-level conversation with big words, but I feel like Craig just ends up clouding his argument behind a thick layer? of impenetrable rhetoric.

hmm. much as I ...
By: nathan87. on 07 May 12, 18:53:38
hmm. much as I wanted to watch this and laugh at craig, what? the heck is harris doing?! I've seen him give this exact same speech elsewhere. At least on first listen, it's as if he's not addressing craig's points but just coming up with stuff he prerehearsed. Could have done much better here.

in the beginning i ...
By: chaosligth. on 27 Apr 12, 14:19:52
in the beginning i actually was listening to craig but when he said the same frase for 1000 time i kinda think he lost me, hes going in circles? not aying anything really.

I actually feel ...
By: GamerJamer. on 25 Apr 12, 16:50:30
I actually feel like my? IQ has increased after watching this.

dont forget Dan ...
By: tomeivens. on 23 Apr 12, 14:40:15
dont forget Dan Dennett too!?

Objective moral ...
By: 0jala. on 19 Apr 12, 12:11:19
Objective moral values,? and duties.

If your still ...
By: 10290gilmore. on 17 Apr 12, 11:21:45
If your still religious after listening to Harris,Hitchens or? Dawkins then there is simply no hope for you.Brainwashing has done a number on your reasoning ability regarding superstition.

@1:26:28 the ...
By: Angaraman. on 13 Apr 12, 18:14:12
@1:26:28 the circularity of the reasoning here? actually caused me PHYSICAL PAIN.

"The? Moral ...
By: jkovert. on 13 Apr 12, 13:25:36
"The? Moral Landscape" was a horrible book.

you gotta love ...
By: AgeOfReasonXXI. on 18 Apr 11, 15:45:01
you gotta love Craig's silly expression when Harris said "I tried to give you a basis, sorry!" which was another way of saying "sorry that you're so retarded and slow to grasp what I'm saying, faith-head. you? may keep repeating that I haven't provided a basis for morality, like a mantra, all you want, it doesn't make it any more true." haha Billy Lame was OWNED.

If God exists, God ...
By: allankohwt. on 18 Apr 11, 11:10:25
If God exists, God create the world, then who create God?? My guess is, God are created by Human in return. Then, if God lay down the moral values, indirectly, the moral values of God, are actually create by human. This is the greatness of human mind. Then, why human want to? create God?? Because, it is a good tools to control the human mind.

Notice that this ...
By: tabrizi79. on 13 Apr 11, 08:09:56
Notice that this isn't really a debate. Harris systematically avoids addressing Craig's arguments and answering his rebuttals. Instead, he changes the? subject to Tsunamis. This is proof that Harris is extremely poor when it comes to philosophy, and that he ultimately got creamed in the debate. This was really humiliating for Harris.

Debate - William Lane Craig vs Christopher Hitchens - Does God Exist?
Posted by: KYLYKaHYT

Video duration: 7940 seconds
Global video hits: 422541

April 4, 2009 - Craig vs. Hitchens Debate from Biola University.

Related: christopher hitchens, william lane craig, debate, does god exist, religion, christianity, atheism, atheist, philosophy

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

ok well? thanks for ...
By: nielsb12345. on 22 May 12, 17:29:31
ok well? thanks for clearing up alot!!

Which gets ...
By: MomoTheBellyDancer. on 22 May 12, 16:46:32
Which gets confounded by the fact that even IF the resurrection had occurred, it would still not form any definite evidence for any god.? Maybe Jesus was a time-traveling cyborg trying to pull a prank on us?

It could be true... ...
By: MISTERWHITE111. on 22 May 12, 16:39:43
It could be true..... it could be that you are entirely different that what your posts indicate. I will not? bet that way, though.

Yes, seeking ...
By: MomoTheBellyDancer. on 22 May 12, 16:22:18
Yes, seeking confirmation for your? biases is indeed nonsense. You're finally learning something.

And this idiotic ...
By: lumpheadthump. on 22 May 12, 14:24:33
And this idiotic self proclaimed "philosopher"? is the theists most respected thinker.....

until Craig doesn't ...
By: arenasification. on 22 May 12, 13:24:46
until Craig doesn't stop to cite? the bible as one of his sources, no one can take him seriously

if there is ...
By: IsaTehGothicMando. on 22 May 12, 13:13:16
if there is evolutionary? pressure or reasons that changes would take place over time and more people born will have different traits that then survive and pass them on, then yes. You would. They would be two distinct species in two different enviroments due to millions of years of evolution. right now there is very little evolutionary pressure upon us as a species, on Mars I imagine that would be not the case.

He is so ridiculous ...
By: arenasification. on 22 May 12, 12:47:18
He is so ridiculous!!! citing the resurrection of Jesus as? fact!!!!! WOW

... same way! Many ...
By: Mentat1231. on 22 May 12, 12:28:19
... same way! Many theists agree that the arguments aren't convincing, but they hardly become "atheists" because of this. They just take belief in God as properly basic. Also, what about the "agnostic theist", who? believes in God, but does not claim to KNOW that God exists? See how silly this kind of thing can get? I think people should "man up" and defend their position. Arif Ahmed, Steven Law, Austin Dacey and several others have done that, and presented *arguments* in favor of atheism.

I'll concede the ...
By: Mentat1231. on 22 May 12, 12:26:24
I'll concede the point. I didn't mean to make it big semantic battle. It's just kind of silly: On the one hand, atheists do agree to debate the issue (as in this video), but then they? insist that they are essentially "agnostic atheists", so they are not really making a claim (even though the traditional definition of "atheism" is indeed the claim: "there is no God"). If all they're saying is "none of your arguments for theism convince me", they should recognize that many THEISTS feel the...

Watching this a few ...
By: 99wmac. on 22 May 12, 11:29:49
Watching this a few months back I thought Craig argued better and that Hitchens had an off day. After a more thorough examination I've decided that Craig is an astute debater, rhetorician and tactician, but his arguments are without foundation - he words them expertly to make them seem logical. His case is far more structured? than Hitchens conversational style but it's still all empty creationist science and Christian scientists - i.e. his rebuttal of the evolution argument.

"...after say a ...
By: citizenghosttown. on 22 May 12, 10:58:44
"...after say a million years we would? see 2 different species? which evolved from the human specie(us) right?" Quite possibly. Essentially you've introduced reproductive isolation into the equation, a circumstance that can certainly can drive evolution - a study of mammalian life in Australia is great example of this. Whether that will result in "new" species within a given period time will depend onother factors - the particular selection pressures etc.

okay okay so let's ...
By: nielsb12345. on 22 May 12, 10:44:01
okay okay so let's say we go to a mission to mars or something and the people? that go there will, if there is not further more contact between earths people and mars people, than after say a million years we would see 2 different species which evolved from the human specie(us) right?

Lane Craig is a ...
By: bigad2326. on 22 May 12, 10:37:38
Lane Craig is a mediocre academic (see his pitiful publication record) who has made a career out of being? a professional debater, nothing more.

"something in the ...
By: citizenghosttown. on 22 May 12, 10:36:12
"something in the dna has to change to make it a different specie,right? " Yes indeed. But of course, it's not as if a single change results in a new species. Your own genome will likely change within your lifetime. Changes in genome? are just single step. Then comes selection or genetic drift - the factors which determine which variants succeed over time.. Depending on the complexity of the organism, you wouldn't see a new species for hundreds of thousands or millions of years.

in? a word "non- ...
By: jamaicanification. on 22 May 12, 07:54:33
in? a word "non-sense"

And how do you know ...
By: jamaicanification. on 22 May 12, 07:54:20
And how do you know this? I have changed my presuppositions on a lot of things. For example, i used to be a Young Earth Creationist, but since reading Darwin, i have accepted Evolution as a? scientific fact. And reading the works of Boccacio, Dante, John Milton has changed my opinions on many things. So again, all you people do is presume that religious people are all a bunch of closeminded idiots, and that you have the Holy Grail of intelligence and openmindedness(continued)

okay well at least ...
By: nielsb12345. on 22 May 12, 06:55:58
okay well at least thank you for not saying im a fool? or something because i have questions also thanks for clearing that up!!! still i got a question something in the dna has to change to make it a different specie,right?

dude really haha ...
By: nielsb12345. on 22 May 12, 06:48:30
dude really haha dafuq why are you getting so pissed when others only have questions about evolution just questions? not attacking like you claim you act as a child, not open for questions

"we did see ...
By: nielsb12345. on 22 May 12, 06:46:06
"we did see speciation occur within relatively short amount of time, both in the lab and in the wild" please show me where i can find this!! a site or a book or something please! me asking questions is what science should always do,is what we should always do.this doesnt make my opinion a diddly-squat simply because i think different than you for now... about the fossil record.. detectingdesign . com/fossilrecord . html debunkingskeptics . com/forum/viewtopic .? php?t=1535

The difference ...
By: MsIndiscipline. on 22 May 12, 06:40:09
The difference between Craig and Hitchens is the same? as between demagogy and intelligence.

"Because i am ...
By: MomoTheBellyDancer. on 22 May 12, 04:25:08
"Because i am genuinely? interested in truth" No, you're not. You simply seek confirmation for your settled beliefs.

"It's gets so ...
By: MomoTheBellyDancer. on 22 May 12, 04:22:48
"It's gets so exaggerated that Craig ends up saying NO argument at all was given against his own" That's Craig for ya, and it's the main reason Dawkins? won't debate this clown.

"really you lived ...
By: MomoTheBellyDancer. on 22 May 12, 04:13:30
"really you lived millions of years " Damn, this is a stupid remark. We don't have to see events directly to see the evidence for them. But yes, we DID see speciation occur within a relatively short amount of time, both in the lab and in the wild. "there are alot of fossils but in my opinion not enough to make it really credible" Your opinion means diddly-squat. We have more fossils than we? ever hoped to find, and more than we need to show that evolution is correct.

Because i am ...
By: jamaicanification. on 22 May 12, 01:33:18
Because i am genuinely interested in truth, irrespective of which of the various disciplines i find it? in . So you know absolutely nothing about me, so dont presume to...........

New Hampshire Republican Debate: Ron Paul Spars With Newt Gingrich Over Military Record
Posted by: ABCNews

Video duration: 212 seconds
Global video hits: 80853

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Versus War on Drugs Debate
Posted by: versusdebates

Video duration: 7795 seconds
Global video hits: 101010

The 1st installment of Versus, The Google+ Debate Series

Related: debate, talk, war on drugs, speech, versus, google+, youtube

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Legalize drugs. ...
By: MrUtoobtroll. on 22 May 12, 14:41:18
Legalize drugs. Darwin will? do his work. Good way to kill a bunch of idiots. Smart ones will use moderately, in private and responsibly.

I know this is ...
By: YeOldeMistyLady. on 22 May 12, 13:47:16
I know this is besides the point but? wow Peter Hitchens is a souless, humourless bastard.

Wrong. I have taken ...
By: Socioistic. on 22 May 12, 02:06:04
Wrong. I have taken drugs in the past. My drug of choice was Oxycodone, and contrary to what you said, I did not start taking it because of some deep desire to feel better about myself, or because of peer pressure, as I have always been a very upbeat, confident person, and I have no friends or peers to influence me to take drugs. I started because of an injury, I continued because I enjoyed it, and I stopped because of the inanely strict? enforcement.

im totally on the ...
By: lyja123. on 22 May 12, 01:15:49
im totally on the side of legalization because i love weed,lsd and mdma but making it legal would make it safer for? everyone, even weed gets sprayed with chemicals and pesticides which if properly regulated would be safer and cheaper :)

The second guy's a ...
By: allmanator13. on 22 May 12, 00:17:41
The second guy's a tool and cannot back up his 'made up' evidence, there has never been? a case where marijuana has caused death, nor does it cause addiction... LEGALIZE WEED

It's completely ...
By: allmanator13. on 22 May 12, 00:13:41
It's completely senseless!! One could drink themselves to death and not receive a fine, or one could consume a large amount of legal medication without being reprimanded yet one bag of cannabis can result in 2 years in jail,? WHAT A JOKE!!

Steve Rolles @ 01: ...
By: HolyCity2012. on 21 May 12, 22:09:58
Steve Rolles @ 01:15:08 destroys every point made by team pro-criminalization. I respect The former governor of New York, Elliot Spitzer as being a progressive in regards to economic policy and an well-rounded, intellectual but here, his talking? points are about as convincing as creationism. And that goes for the whole, lot of them. They are only a slight measure, more intriguing than Evangelicals Christians as far as there unsubstantiated hyperbole and endless spin jobs are concerned.

go russell brand?
By: Parambofficial. on 21 May 12, 19:02:44
go russell brand?

48:50 he just? ...
By: theHedgex1. on 21 May 12, 16:48:16
48:50 he just? challanged this guys death O.o

I noticed that too. ...
By: damianGray. on 21 May 12, 14:45:31
I noticed that too. I was quite shocked at how blatant he was when he said that the crime rate in America was down. Last I knew it was fairly high and wasn't going down any time soon.?

As much as I ...
By: damianGray. on 21 May 12, 14:43:16
As much as I despise American politics and politicians, I feel the need to correct you in that ALL? politicians are about altering the facts, talking in circles and manipulating what others say. Spin is their game and they play it very well. If they didn't, the world would be a much different (and better) place.

The woman at 1:07: ...
By: damianGray. on 21 May 12, 14:38:22
The woman at 1:07:43 could just as easily be talking about the so called 'war on terror' as she is the war on drugs. The parallels are shockingly? similar.

People who want to ...
By: Nahasanamapela. on 21 May 12, 14:34:52
People who want to change their consciousness seek or take drugs,? not "sick people". It's a innate human desire to change ones consciousness. Our mind is as vast at the whole universe and all people should take psychedelic drugs to venture out of the arena we are shackled to by million years of evolution. Our normal consciousness is what it is because it is best fitted for survival; it's not the be-all end-all of human experience.

lol @ Western ...
By: damianGray. on 21 May 12, 14:30:21
lol @ Western Australia being a small isolated country.... it is in fact a STATE of Australia, not a country, and Australia may be the smallest continent, but it is not much smaller in? landmass than the US.

*Your lol?
By: dddfffgggyyy. on 21 May 12, 13:30:05
*Your lol?

corruption is the ...
By: Oriente7. on 21 May 12, 07:10:40
corruption is the result of society, and society? is government.

Russell Brand is? ...
By: KhanneaSuntzu. on 21 May 12, 05:18:00
Russell Brand is? my gateway drug to unmitigated passion and lust.

Me too? And I ...
By: KhanneaSuntzu. on 21 May 12, 05:16:03
Me too? And I prefer everyone speaks English. Dutch is a foul, offensive guttural language that disallows a civilized human to fully self-express. Please stop? speaking dutch.

I don't trust ...
By: KhanneaSuntzu. on 21 May 12, 05:14:38
I don't trust politicians who push prohibition. By default I'd assume they are being paid by criminal syndicates.?

That annoying ...
By: smurfylaa. on 21 May 12, 02:01:05
That annoying blonde woman is biased as fuck. You can tell? she fancies the? stupid Elliot Spitzer guy, and at the end she's clearly delighted by the 15% shit. She needs a big fat line and a shag up the arse.

Stop assuming the ...
By: mafiamitzy. on 20 May 12, 16:41:39
Stop assuming the whole world speaks English,? I´m from the Netherlands

People who are ...
By: Bak3dB3an. on 20 May 12, 14:53:05
People who are fullfilled don't seek or take drugs. Only a small percentage do through peer pressure. The rest are after being abused? in various forms and being in a society which isn't focused on healing. There should be more healing centers world wide on every street corner than anything else. Instead there are liquor stores, brothels, candy and soda stores, gambling places, dark clubs etc. A healing society doesn't produce sick people.

Stopping pedlars ...
By: Bak3dB3an. on 20 May 12, 14:42:05
Stopping pedlars and traffickers is the right answer. Punishing the farmers? and the addicted consumers is the wrong answer.

$Richard Dawkins, Rowan Williams, Anthony Kenny: \"Human Beings & Ultimate Origin\" Debate$

Richard Dawkins, Rowan Williams, Anthony Kenny: "Human Beings & Ultimate Origin" Debate
Posted by: DrWhoDaMan

Video duration: 5337 seconds
Global video hits: 40258

Debate at the Sheldonian Theatre, Oxford, February 23rd 2012 with Prof Richard Dawkins, Archbishop of Canterbury Dr Rowan Williams and Philosopher Sir Anthony Kenny. For further analysis of Dawkins' arguments in The God Delusion: www.youtube.com For Dawkins' discussion with Sam Harris: www.youtube.com

Related: richard, dawkins, rowan, williams, anthony, kenny, archbishop, of, canterbrury, god, christianity, debate, agnostic, atheism, darwin, origin, species, giles, fraser, philosophy, oxford, sheldonian, william, lane, craig, dawkinsarchbishop

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Preexisting ...
By: Seekmosttoprophesy. on 21 May 12, 18:22:55
Preexisting directives direct everything in? the life forms. Nothing in the life forms does what it does without the preexisting word that made it do what it does. We were directed to have a sense of self.

Human intelligence ...
By: wrayburn27. on 18 May 12, 09:30:07
Human intelligence directs? the computer. What directs the genome and what does the genome direct?What beyond the individual has a sense of self ?

Computers, like the ...
By: Seekmosttoprophesy. on 18 May 12, 04:01:41
Computers, like the genome, can? only do what they are directed to do.

I am? glad that you ...
By: Seekmosttoprophesy. on 18 May 12, 03:49:05
I am? glad that you, Richard, admit that it is too hard to believe that objects and related forces made or remade what you are because that is just absurd. We need to completely discard any such baseless, irrational and illogical false belief.

This reminds me of ...
By: Seekmosttoprophesy. on 18 May 12, 03:39:48
This reminds me of the Westminster Confession? when they decided that God no longer reveals His will to us without saying if God revealed that to them.

Rowan Williams is a ...
By: mysteryperson1976. on 17 May 12, 01:14:00
Rowan Williams is a creationist? Most theologians, that I know of, in the Anglican Communion are in support of evolution. There's a film of an Anglican Priest getting extremely angry at a couple of Muslims for speaking against evolution. Bishop Katharine Schori spoke of how? evolution is what should be taught in schools. Bishop John Shelby Spong said that the Biblical story of us falling into sin is pre-Darwinian mythology, post-Darwinian nonsense.

Yes, artificial ...
By: shakyricLshadow1111. on 13 May 12, 21:25:13
Yes, artificial intelligence is a reality, but as I said in my last comment, the robots in question are extremely stupid. We as humans normally define intelligence as something simalar to us in terms of behavior. Examples like art, language, and math, that only the smartest animals are capable of achieving. However. You could have your own definition of intelligence.? I personally, define intelligence as being able to best adapt to the enviroment and the ability to solve problems in nature.

Depends on how ...
By: shakyricLshadow1111. on 13 May 12, 21:15:55
Depends on how smart the robot is. If the robot has programs which allow it to learn, then the human designer is no longer needed. However, our technology in this area, while it is increasing, isn't so good at that level.? In other words, we have the technology, but the robot in question is a total idiot, making the human designer a much wanted addition.

But surely a robot ...
By: wrayburn27. on 13 May 12, 20:53:54
But surely a robot can only improvise within the limited? parameters set by its external human designer?

I wasn't really ...
By: wrayburn27. on 13 May 12, 20:48:08
I wasn't really thinking in terms of smart/dumb. More types of approach. A computer can master vast amounts of data but as for using it for any purpose of its own? devising, it can't because it it isn't sentient. Even without a brain an eathworm can detect and respond to a dangerous footfall because it IS sentient. How can intelligence be defined, then, and is Artificial Intelligence a reality?

No, improvition/ ...
By: shakyricLshadow1111. on 13 May 12, 20:38:03
No, improvition/adaptation does not define natural intelligence. I? could understand why one would think so. Robots have been designed to improvise according to their enviroment. Computers don't have limbs, but robots do. So if you make a robot with a computer thats smart enough, then yes it can improvise, and because this would be classified as an artificial intelligence, improvition/adaptation would not define natural intelligence.

Yes, I can see that ...
By: wrayburn27. on 13 May 12, 20:23:43
Yes, I can see that a stroke might be a more direct analogy, yet a human limb functions? neuronally as an extension of the human brain. Somehow the brain diagnoses the fault in the system, and without any pre-programming enables the limb to make a kind of compensation - though we remain quite unaware of how our neurons do this. A computer could not generate new ways of using its own components to help itself if it was damaged. Does improvisation/ adaptation define natural intelligence ?

Computers crashing ...
By: shakyricLshadow1111. on 13 May 12, 15:30:46
Computers crashing and a human breaking a limb isn't a proper comparison. A proper comparison would be a computer crashing, and a human stroke victum. However I will answer your question, when a computer crashes for whatever reason, the damage is being done to the "brain". This means that information, certain software, and other programs can be lost. The human body is relatively good at improvising. In your example the human? already knows that he/she can get home by using his good leg.

The difference ...
By: shakyricLshadow1111. on 13 May 12, 15:17:08
The difference between natural and artificial stupidity. Well, this all stems from the neurons. If by stupidity you mean just plain dumb, then this is the result of multiple things which includes, lack of sufficiant neurons(to be what we consider smart) and damage of the brain. If neurons are kept from connecting? properly then the information being passed through them is disrupted. This on a large scale could pose a serious problem. There other ways to achieve stupidity though.

Lol, don't worry, ...
By: shakyricLshadow1111. on 13 May 12, 15:03:22
Lol, don't worry, it wasn't a full brain,(at least I don't think so), but just a few neurons. Anyway, the point was to show you the power the neurons have at animating things. Its quite hard to see with complex creatures like us and dolphins, ( the two species who just so happen to have the largest brains in the world) however I was hoping that watching? the video would help you better understand my position, and show you the complexity and "free will" having neurons can bring.

P.S. I also watched ...
By: wrayburn27. on 13 May 12, 08:48:46
P.S. I also watched Rat brain robot as you suggested but failed to grasp the mechanism involved. The impression given was that the robot was attempting to avoid? contact with any object it encountered which is quite unlike a normally curious rat which appears driven to explore it's environmant. If it resembled a rat at all, it was a trapped rat in a state of terror.

Thankyou for ...
By: wrayburn27. on 13 May 12, 07:43:37
Thankyou for answering my question concerning the difference between natural and artificial intelligence. I also wondered if you could tell me the difference between natural and artificial stupidity? Also although computers are designed so you can control them, when they crash they crash completely. A human though, breaking an ankle say, could still hobble home by using muscles etc in the other leg? which weren't which they weren't pre-programmed to do. Something else vital is suggested by this.

"The effect a? ...
By: shakyricLshadow1111. on 12 May 12, 16:58:45
"The effect a? belief on some metaphysical entity like God has on humans is also real." I know it is. Its this effect that has many atheist trying to enforce secularism in America. That however is besides the point, I'm not saying we should just believe in something for the positive results,(which in this case might be a good reason) but what I am saying is that the illusion of morality is so strong, no ones going to just drop it, especially if they reap the benifets of it.

Well then let´s ...
By: ThePhilosorpheus. on 12 May 12, 01:40:48
Well then let´s apply this same method of thinking to the theological realm: The effect a belief on some metaphysical entity like God has? on humans is also real. Does it mean we should live as if it existed, if we think such belief brings positive material consequences? Then let´s generalize this principle: should we embrace scientific knowledge/method only as long as it brings positive consequences?

That´s the point. ...
By: ThePhilosorpheus. on 12 May 12, 01:28:11
That´s the point. Life justifies values, but you need values to justify life first. This is a philosophical (logical) fallacy known as? begging the question.You consider a "survival? advantage" to be valuable but you know values are an illusion. This advantage is not then really valuable, and it cannot therefore justify values. The value of life must be based on morality (the reality of values), not the opposite, otherwise it´s a logical contradiction.

I have already ...
By: shakyricLshadow1111. on 11 May 12, 21:16:53
I have already embraced that morals are? illusary. I've said that numerous times. But I cannot deny the survival advantage having morals bring. Nor is it easy to just loose them.

You're right, ...
By: shakyricLshadow1111. on 11 May 12, 21:11:50
You're right, science doesn't justify ethics. Now we know that these morals are illusary, however, the affect that having these morals has on us isn't an ilusion at all. "the jungle´s law " will never enter into a society like ours( complex animals, dolphins, whales, elephants,ect...) As long as people see value in? their own life( as illusary as it might be) they'll see the value in the lives of others, allowing the moral code to persist.

You know you "see" ...
By: ThePhilosorpheus. on 11 May 12, 03:29:36
You know you "see" the value of things and that you love things, thats a fact. But theres a difference between what "is" and what "should" be. And since you follow the scientific method of systematic denial of metaphysical entities, wouldn´t it be arbitrary to decide to give in to those illusions while rejecting others (like god)? Science cannot justify ethics. As soon as society is educated enough about the scientific perspective on ethics,? the jungle´s law will rule again.

World Oil Supply Debate
Posted by: ontheearthproduction

Video duration: 3584 seconds
Global video hits: 11152

Dr. Tadeus Patzek, Chair, Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering, University of Texas - Austin John Hofmeister, President, Citizens for Affordable Energy Moderator: Dr. Alan Carroll, Geology and Geophysics, UW-Madison

Related: world, oil, debate, petroleum

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Its funny how the ...
By: nickbobj321. on 22 Apr 12, 13:20:54
Its funny how the guy who just wants more oil says theres oil everywhere, when all that? would do is deplete all reserves quicker. And the engineer says that there is no oil and its depleting, which seems more likely. Also he does not make it political and spews facts not nonsense.

Well no offence but ...
By: nickbobj321. on 22 Apr 12, 12:56:20
Well no offence but a few people wont deminish its demand and its depletion. Also the price is controled buy fianacial speculation not price discovery, you would be right if this? market was free but it is not.

Boycott buying fuel ...
By: Scottleewebbdotcom. on 18 Apr 12, 22:36:48
Boycott buying fuel till these companies lower? their prices!

By the way ...
By: izaccy. on 15 Apr 12, 09:40:54
By the way Hofmeister says they should have a regulatory independent group of people to plan our oil, because politicians are bought something im sure he as a former CEO of Shell knows a lot about. But then he goes on to say that the independent group will be elected by the Politicians wait a minute so? if the corrupt politician chooses those who should be on the independent committee then whats the difference ? wtf..

Is amazing how both ...
By: izaccy. on 15 Apr 12, 09:29:56
Is amazing how both of them remained unbelievably tight lipped about burning carbon emissions and the climate change. They? talked about the potential impact on the environment a little bit due to moving closer to where people live, but NASA´s study on climate change is shocking and it can permanently damage the earth. By the way the government spends billions to artificially keep the oil prices down through oil subsidies, didnt mention that either.

Hofmeister got an ...
By: izaccy. on 15 Apr 12, 09:21:20
Hofmeister got an incredible naive way of thinking about Oil prices, he thinks? is like a cash of gold that is hanging from the trees, and we should get them before the chinese or the indians do, If only it was that easy.

The US has a 100 ...
By: TheChristianRight09. on 08 Apr 12, 02:15:57
The US has a 100 plus year supply of natural gas,oil matters not in the long run.................CNG verses oil is like Red Box verses? Block Buster....Any product or service can price its self out of the market....It happens over and over...

Going into this ...
By: nelsonaben. on 05 Apr 12, 02:01:50
Going into this debate, I thought I would be disagreeing with Dr. Patzek quite a bit. He actually? surprised me with his honesty and practical solutions, unlike so many eco-nuts on the left. He wasn't sugar-coating new, potential technologies, nor was he shaming everyone with a siren-song about how we're all guilty for being human and destroying the planet. Conservatives and practical people need to embrace his message about our unsustainable, unhealthy, and anti-social lifestyle.

John Hofmeister, ...
By: boodejan. on 25 Feb 12, 20:25:40
John Hofmeister, President, Citizens for Affordable Energy get the oil out of? the ground as fast as we can - strength through exhaustion?

Dr. Tadeus Patzek, ...
By: boodejan. on 25 Feb 12, 20:24:20
Dr. Tadeus Patzek, Chair, Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering, University of Texas - Austin states at 12.44 we will never run out? of fossil fuels. He should be sacked!

Both of these guys ...
By: fuggybootnling. on 21 Feb 12, 02:07:49
Both of these guys seem to be missing the EROEI problem -? Energy Return on Energy Invested. I think this is incredibly key - even if you start mining shale oil it would return barely enough net energy to justify the task. And we live in a society that is predicated on having not just available energy, but a healthy surplus per capita to keep things running. That GOING down - no matter how much you Drill Baby Drill.

make power with the ...
By: LichtstromMacher. on 20 Feb 12, 14:45:32
make power with the power of the sun only 2 EUR per watt! I am a? installer and searching for PV projects worldwide...

The former ...
By: pwoz3. on 18 Feb 12, 11:57:49
The former president of Shell slams "special interests influencing Congress" but neglects to mention that the oil, coal and gas companies are the major lobbyists and campaign funders along with the banks. He claims that offshore lands and federal lands? could grow US oil, but he fails to disclose the facts he knows-- it is a teaspoon compared to the 20-24 million barrels a day of USA oil demand. Patzek gives us the truth: This is just like Iraq 2004. We're in deep trouble without a Plan B.

Count on yourself ...
By: MrEnergyCzar. on 18 Feb 12, 04:51:24
Count on yourself to prepare for Peak Oil. I've been doing it for 5 years... it is possible to cut your total energy? use by 90% and still participate in the current world... MrEnergyCzar

Hofmeister reminds ...
By: jimbills. on 18 Feb 12, 04:26:53
Hofmeister reminds me of the Dick Cheney quote, "The American way of life is not negotiable." It sounds good, but it's nonsense. His? suggestions all amount to amazingly expensive and complex tech that (whether they work or not) WILL raise energy prices (which translate into increased burden on the middle and lower classes) and WILL increase risk to ecosystems (no matter how much risk management is in place - and btw, safety costs extra). It amounts to the same thing as peak oil.

Neither men have ...
By: ESTAUST01. on 18 Feb 12, 01:41:50
Neither men have obviously heard of SPINTRONICS. It and Lithium-Air Batteries will solve most of our problems. Companies? like WESTERN LITHIUM are probably a good place to park your money. As Jeff Rubin has said, once we reach the full effects of PEAK OIL the ever increasing cost of marine bunker fuel will simply destroy any price advantage of the South American Brines.

That was supposed? ...
By: aangel100. on 17 Feb 12, 22:45:31
That was supposed? to be the "500 largest" fields, from which we get 2/3 of our oil.

For an accurate ...
By: aangel100. on 17 Feb 12, 22:45:01
For an accurate view of our future, google "german military peak oil report english". Too bad Hoffmeister doesn't understand the geological facts. All those reserves can't make up for the 500 giant and supergiant fields when they decline. He should read the peer reviewed paper "Giant oil field decline rates and their influence on world oil production"? to understand the situation better.

Agree.Use less, ...
By: vtaable. on 17 Feb 12, 18:45:10
Agree.Use less,maybe improve public transportation like where I live in Tx, so won't waste gasoline so much.If countries like china kept its petroleum reserves since a long time ago,bought frm many countries, while Hofmeister thought better to produce more n more.What? will happen in the future,say the next 20 years?If we buy later,pricy,maybe no more domestic reserves.Unless we could be fossil fuel independent use solar/wind/renewable energy, but maybe the cost is still too high.

31:17 through 32:17 ...
By: eat9bologna9peasant. on 17 Feb 12, 16:02:48
31:17 through 32:17 "you'll be suprised how much people can achieve if? they start acting alone.."

They agreed that ...
By: nielssolar. on 17 Feb 12, 15:28:08
They agreed that there is a lot of oil/fossil fuels, prices are going up,? we have to do energy efficiency, we should go towards a carbon free planet... They disagree on our ability to get the oil out, and how well governments could work. I do not see their differences very great.

He? does lie well.
By: Weaseldog2001. on 17 Feb 12, 14:20:29
He? does lie well.

He is? incredibly ...
By: Weaseldog2001. on 17 Feb 12, 14:18:55
He is? incredibly ignorant. He thinks oil availability has nothing to do with geology.

So, does Hofmeister ...
By: Weaseldog2001. on 17 Feb 12, 14:07:28
So, does Hofmeister think the oil under the ground in North America exceeds the mass and volume of the universe? He's big? on rhetoric, but short on numbers.

Ron Paul VS Paul Krugman 4-30-12 FULL Bloomberg
Posted by: ALLRonPaul

Video duration: 1624 seconds
Global video hits: 19791

This aired on Bloomberg TV 4-30-12 Ron Paul vs Paul Krugman Debate Warning: This video contains copyright material and is being used under Title 17 USC Section 107 Fair Usage for non profit, non competing, educational, political commentary and criticism..This is Fully allowed under US Copyright Law Title 17 USC Section 107

Related: ron paul us congressperson, president, nominee, bloomberg, professor, paul, krugman

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

You tell me one ...
By: tedwa14. on 21 May 12, 21:56:23
You tell me one thing that you could revise on the constitution that wouldnt make Americans less free? The fact is, I dont care how far we have come of altering it, it still does not make it right to say? that the things that were altered have to stay altered. I have deep respect for the people that sacrificed their lives for freedom. Freedom has never been so fragil, so us Ron Paul fans are going to put it on a pedastal and nurture that bitch and squeeze whoevers nuts that get in the way.

Ron Paul like the ...
By: tedwa14. on 21 May 12, 21:49:04
Ron Paul like the fathers do not wont people idolizing them.. I do? not get your comparison here? Ron Paul does not care about people idolizing them unlike the Obomney duo. He doesnt have to win people over because, freedom is idolized more than anything. The constituion is set up to keep the people free. It also serves as a rule book for the government to what they can and cannot do to the people. What is so wrong about following the constitution? I do not get peoples thinking on this...

The constitution is ...
By: augustofretes. on 21 May 12, 14:22:44
The constitution is clear, that's exactly why I know Ron Paul so often misreads it, since he claims many things are unconstitutional despite not being found anywhere on it. I understand the men and women whom influenced the law, but that's hardly an argument... one problem with hard core constitutionalists is that they forget that the founders themselves were not in favor of people idolizing them. They were also in favor of revising the constitution often, i.e. they were not constitutionalists.?

The great ...
By: ScientificChampion. on 20 May 12, 23:53:22
The great depression was caused by the federal reserve? and the government Paul Krugman life work is sham and a lie

Red arrow- You need ...
By: tedwa14. on 20 May 12, 16:51:12
Red arrow- You need to do some fucking research. I dont have time to punk your? ass out on my phone

Metal28655- you ...
By: tedwa14. on 20 May 12, 16:25:27
Metal28655- you tell me what syndra, frannie and freddie, ime bank, etc.... Are?? The give donations to politicians, they get tax breaks. The government bails all of the company's out with tax payer money. To me that doesn't make competition. That makes it ok for them to do whatever they want and give donations to? the government. I know how that shot works and I'm not getting fooled again

Krugman got owned!? ...
By: astaquenopueda. on 20 May 12, 15:47:39
Krugman got owned!? Good job Paul. You can't teach an old dog new tricks.

Businesses are ...
By: metal28655. on 20 May 12, 09:27:13
Businesses are forced to compete because everyone is offering different services to survive. A business losing to the competition has to figure out how to offer a better quality of service or that business will eventually fail from inability to cover cost. It has nothing to do with greed. Without competition, you would have ONE company who sold you everything and when the owner realizes this he is tempted to become greedy.? But then with it that person is forced to reject greed for survival.

Paul Krugman wrote ...
By: metal28655. on 20 May 12, 09:17:48
Paul Krugman wrote a response to this debate. In his blog he? claims that Ron Paul got his history wrong. Interesting enough Mr. Krugman was not kind enough to point out to us exactly what he meant. He response was simply "He was WRONG". Evidence must not be required for professors. Thomas Sowell, who has a doctorate in economics opposes Krugman. Wonder why???

One thing all those ...
By: metal28655. on 20 May 12, 08:54:29
One thing all those men have in? common is a great understanding of history!

I am and he does ...
By: metal28655. on 20 May 12, 08:52:53
I am and he does not misread it. The Constitution is very clear. I suggest reading well into: John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, George Mason, and Montesquieu. Understanding the men who influenced our law and you may have a different opinion. I did not trust Ron Paul for years. After listening to him on a wide variety of subjects, and I can promise he is a patron of liberty. ? I'm open for any questions, if you would like.

I feel sorry for ...
By: redarrowhead2. on 20 May 12, 03:32:29
I feel sorry for krugman he is stuck answering tweets? and getting ignored for 20min while ron paul is pandering to the foolish masses.

I'm not a ...
By: augustofretes. on 20 May 12, 02:40:24
I'm not a constitutionalist, and I? although I like Ron Paul, he misreads the constitution quite often. Having said that, you're wrong. Gold isn't money, Ron Paul wants it to be money again. These are two different things, I was actually defending Ron, and calling dishonesty on Krugman.

I would say I was ...
By: redarrowhead2. on 20 May 12, 02:31:17
I would say I was happy that ron paul ended financing his campaign if he posed any? significant threat to romney, let alone obama.

you can. buy gold.? ...
By: redarrowhead2. on 20 May 12, 02:27:25
you can. buy gold.? go to a store and give them the gold.

Ron paul only ...
By: redarrowhead2. on 20 May 12, 02:26:47
Ron paul only really won because he got more air time and additionally it is difficult to counter data when it cannot be verified. In fact krugman was interrupted often even when there? was a point to counter. Paul did not even correctly interpret what Friedman was saying (ie Fed should have reacted stronger in the Depression). That is why the debate is useless. It is not really a debate. A politican vs a professor pfft. Top? tier economists do not agree with ron paul mind you. He is a kook.

You appear to know ...
By: pippipmagrip. on 20 May 12, 02:21:11
You appear to know nothing of your Constitution.It stated that? gold and silver were legal tender. I personally do not like the idea of a government's debt certificate being money,legal tender.I want to use gold and silver.Why shouldn't I?The Fed is not part of government,why should it try to control the economy?Where is the public mandate for it to do so?Why shouldn't it be audited like any other financial institution?

actually in that ...
By: redarrowhead2. on 20 May 12, 02:20:28
actually in that column he said that much of what ron paul said about the? economy after WW2 was false (starting 6:05). US debt stayed pretty much the same if you look at a graph so I wouldn't say a "lot" of it was liquidated. He then says we cut taxes (which is funny since back then taxes on the rich were enormous) and he says we cut spending by 60%, which is already not likely since going back to my 2 points of little debt reduction and high income tax rates. Really this is pathetic.

Krugman says he ...
By: pippipmagrip. on 20 May 12, 02:10:26
Krugman says he doesn't know what money is.Ron Paul is saying a lot more than just the gold standard.Krugman is arguing for controlling the economy using the Fed.Ron Paul is saying government shouldn't? run the economy.Where does it say in the Constitution that the Federal government or the Federal Reserve has the power to control the economy? I've not seen where that is.

QUOTE: "A free ...
By: gunsandbullhorns. on 18 May 12, 21:34:25
QUOTE: "A free market doesn't work because of externalities and? barriers to entry. As a result the free market which, in theory will lead to perfect competition, will? lead to monopolies and monopolistic competition." The "perfect competition" model is a dystopic paradox. Barriers to entry are not a free-market phenomena. "Monopolistic competition" is a myth. As for externalities, those are the result of inconsistent or non-existent property rights. Are you familiar with these arguments?

I didn't say so, ...
By: augustofretes. on 18 May 12, 02:24:23
I didn't say so, but to be fair, economy? is the only Nobel two persons can get for saying exactly the opposite... Anyway, that Gold isn't money is a fact (as stated by, for example Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the Federal Reserve). I'm not saying Krugman doesn't know about money, I'm saying the opposite, I'm 100% sure Krugman knows Gold isn't money.

Ya Mr Krugman some ...
By: mulabate. on 17 May 12, 21:46:17
Ya Mr Krugman some of the Fundemental factors are the rule & control over money,business & govt is in the hands of the few at the World Banking System & World stock exchange speculators running currupt Casino type Fiat currency systems in the industrialized nations. This system by design fails the masses, yet perpetuates the continuation of the few in control who will always be bailed out & propped-up no matter how financially insecure any nations citizen masses become.It? needs to be outlawed.

You can't create ...
By: mulabate. on 17 May 12, 21:16:23
You can't create demand, or levels of consumerism ignoring the real numbers of incomeless in the available workforce. neither Krugman or Paul admitted out of the 314? million documented citizens 77 million won't be in the job arena leaving an available workforce of 237 million where currently for 2011 IRS filing of all individual income reported stand at 133.4 million. That leaves 103.6 million in the available workforce unaccounted for..The levels of human poverty in USA aren't identified truely

Congratulations; ...
By: HitokiriFyre. on 17 May 12, 18:23:44
Congratulations; you're the one? person on Earth who thought Krugman won that round. Even Krugman admits he lost this debate (hence his "debates don't matter" column that immediately followed).

CNN/RPOF/HLN Republican Presidential Debate @ University of N. FL - Jacksonville - January 26, 2012
Posted by: PointZeroRed

Video duration: 6545 seconds
Global video hits: 235060

Time: 08:00 PM (20:00) EST on Thursday, January 26th, 2012 Location: University of North Florida in Jacksonville, Florida Broadcast: CNN Sponers: Republican Party of Florida and the Hispanic Leadership Network Host: Wolf Blitzer Participants: Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum, Ron Paul

Related: mitt romney, newt gingrich, rick santorum, ron paul, republican, gop, fl, 2012, election, debate, wolf blitzer, hispanic leadership network, hln, republican party of florida, rpof, university of north florida, unf, jacksonville, florida, cnn, jan 26, january 26, january 26th, 0126, 01262012, hd, 720p

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

I HATE OBAMA?
By: lljcool7. on 21 May 12, 15:23:10
I HATE OBAMA?

Flip Flop HOORAY!! ...
By: tuck295q. on 20 May 12, 05:37:25
Flip Flop HOORAY!! Flip Flop Hooray!?

Mitt Mitt..? ...
By: OfficialyungGIST. on 18 May 12, 19:46:36
Mitt Mitt..? Hoorray!!

Mitt? Mitt ... ...
By: OfficialyungGIST. on 18 May 12, 19:45:27
Mitt? Mitt ...Hoorray !!

CAPITALISM creates ...
By: koppellhinex. on 18 May 12, 04:39:00
CAPITALISM creates DRUG LORDS. LAWYERS. BANKERS. ELITE CRIMINALS. INEQUALITY. INSTABILITY. GREED. RUTHLESS COMMUNISM. NWO. NAZI. TERRORISM. LAZY PEOPLE. REBEL POLITICIAN. ANARCHY. worst is WAR etc.. ? ? ? ? ? ? CAPITALISM was designed only for CORRUPT OPPORTUNISTIC MANIPULATIVE LAZY POLITICIAN. BANKERS. NARCOPOLITICIAN. JUDGES. CRIMINALS. DICTATORS. RULERS. KING. SULTANATE. EMPEROR? etc.. HARD WORKING PEACE LOVING HAPPY HONEST SOCIETY were always the slave victim and poorly starve to death. :(

I was thinking Paul ...
By: kirov1010. on 16 May 12, 18:05:45
I was thinking Paul one more ass,? but not...

"Anti-racists" say ...
By: oigroig111. on 16 May 12, 12:50:15
"Anti-racists" say there's a RACE problem. They say it'll be solved when non-Whites pour into ALL & ONLY White nations and "assimilate" to get a brown mixture. They say only White nations have this RACE problem; they say non-White nations? are fine. If I object to my own genocide these "anti-racists" say I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews. They say they're anti-racist. What they are is anti-White. Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White.

Radical Christians ...
By: wwwonderful. on 15 May 12, 13:03:31
Radical Christians in NATO troops, led by god-freak America, are terrorising oil-producing nations?

america pretty much ...
By: shireenkhattak. on 14 May 12, 21:55:14
america pretty much ruined latin america and that lady? wants them to go in again? seriously?

Even?
By: MrKishanpapa. on 14 May 12, 05:28:05
Even?

im 16 and i noe ...
By: 69llullu. on 14 May 12, 01:36:46
im 16 and i noe that newt gingrich is a fucking? dumbass!!!!

1:02:54 "The ...
By: EricSmyth14. on 13 May 12, 19:42:51
1:02:54 "The problem with everyone? on the stage is, although they said the same thing, Ron Paul is the only one who has been saying it the whole time." I like that. Lol

8:55? i wonder ...
By: VivyRook. on 12 May 12, 21:58:03
8:55? i wonder who's idea that was.

herman cain was a ...
By: kell1reilly2. on 10 May 12, 23:19:47
herman cain was a bible thumping goon who dropped out (quite some time ago i might add) because he was caught allegedly having sexually harassed people back in the day; 1) his 9-9-9 plan was found to be actually be disastrous for the middle class 2) he's on the losing side of history when it comes to social issues. and its all cuz of his religion. and as the old saying goes, 3) his pizza's shitty too and u can't BE a country.?

herman cain was a ...
By: kell1reilly2. on 10 May 12, 23:19:40
herman cain was a bible thumping goon who dropped out (quite some time ago i might add)? because he was caught allegedly having sexually harassed people back in the day; 1) his 9-9-9 plan was found to be actually be disastrous for the middle class 2) he's on the losing side of history when it comes to social issues. and its all cuz of his religion. and as the old saying goes, 3) his pizza's shitty too and u can't BE a country.

Herman Cain will ...
By: vicrockz89. on 10 May 12, 05:21:36
Herman Cain will bring united back into the United? States! I AM AMERICA!!!!!

yeah,? NOT happenin'
By: kell1reilly2. on 10 May 12, 02:51:04
yeah,? NOT happenin'

@Michthemitch - the ...
By: dogeymon83. on 09 May 12, 05:02:39
@Michthemitch - the democratic party is the party of tyranny. What the? hell do you hope in a party that's been known its whole existence for racism and socialism? Do you want freedom or not???

@GnrlKhalidPC - Ron ...
By: dogeymon83. on 09 May 12, 05:01:12
@GnrlKhalidPC - Ron Paul is someone who I can see making sure Obama wins. He probably won't endorse Romney and instead Just begin his foolish? campaign of dividing republicans and making Obama win.

HERMAN CAIN? 2012
By: vicrockz89. on 08 May 12, 05:24:42
HERMAN CAIN? 2012

Ron Paul no other ...
By: MichaelTMurray. on 08 May 12, 02:27:21
Ron Paul no other will? do! Ron Paul 2012:)

he said except for ...
By: Brian567899. on 08 May 12, 00:28:16
he said except for ron paul, and he? is 100% right, he is the only person who deserves president

The Democratic ...
By: Michthemitch. on 07 May 12, 12:59:06
The Democratic party:? the party of HOPE The republican party: the? party of FEAR

Ron Paul aka Dr. ...
By: NoxDeadly. on 03 May 12, 20:19:05
Ron Paul aka Dr. Hindsight, how about coming up with a logical solution for once, it frustrates me because I like him and his mind is in the right place, but he doesnt know how to come up with logical solutions, his ideas on resolving the war were soooo out of wack and not based on reality, his proposal on stabilizing the economy was like listening to a man tell a fairytale, and when he? said the civil war was fought over slavery it made me believe he just doesnt know how the world works

There´s only one ...
By: daniel6647100. on 02 May 12, 13:20:11
There´s only one way to win this... go to every Ron Paul video... Like every one of them... Like every comment associated with the man... send to your friends... change your political status to republican (even if you´re? not, you have to blend in with the system)... vote ron paul VOTE HIM! Coz i can´t i´m Spanish.

Richard Dawkins vs Cardinal George Pell (Archbishop of Sydney) DEBATE Q and A
Posted by: HellenicHumanist

Video duration: 3656 seconds
Global video hits: 9350

Latest comments made on this video:

please don't get ...
By: whogotdmosh. on 21 May 12, 09:30:21
please don't get sand in? your vagina didn't mean to offend you.

sorry, didn't mean ...
By: whogotdmosh. on 21 May 12, 09:29:57
sorry, didn't mean to offend you.?

retarded? smile 25 ...
By: abxvistro. on 21 May 12, 01:13:38
retarded? smile 25:03

Yes, it's just you!?
By: paulc1939. on 20 May 12, 19:39:28
Yes, it's just you!?

It's? you.
By: pages2. on 18 May 12, 10:15:02
It's? you.

is it me or does ...
By: whogotdmosh. on 16 May 12, 13:35:43
is it me or does dawkins actually look demonic? his? eyes just look so cold and evil.

"The first audience ...
By: geeblanco. on 16 May 12, 11:38:41
"The first audience member to speak in tongues gets free DVD from me" & "I get my morals from 'Game Of Thrones'."? Quality viewer participation Australia, Kudos!!!

Cardinal Pell ...
By: Sammo1357. on 16 May 12, 10:51:10
Cardinal Pell frustrates me a great deal. He adopts a calm demeanour, and then issues half, abstract 'answers' to most of the questions he receives. When pressed on them mildly, he gives an almost? irrelevant short response, avoiding Dawkins' actual questions, while receiving moronic applauds. To questions such as "is an atheist going to Hell?" Pell gives a "oh of course (don't be ridiculous)" reply. Yes, you can pretend it is so, but care elaborate on centuries of inconsistencies?

God? save us from ...
By: 4intentsandpurposes. on 16 May 12, 07:12:38
God? save us from religion

"Nice? unbiased ...
By: DeathToTheseWalls. on 16 May 12, 04:44:04
"Nice? unbiased audience," says Dawkins. I guess he just ignored the times they clapped for him prior. lol

I despair. Their is ...
By: MrReggaepal. on 14 May 12, 23:28:44
I despair. Their is nothing more frustrating to me than to witness ignorant people laughing naively at rationality. The teethy grins of the arrogant and ignorant make me feel sick.?

Those two dads? ...
By: sylmarmusic2012. on 14 May 12, 03:38:00
Those two dads? weren't perverts.

Christ himself ...
By: sylmarmusic2012. on 14 May 12, 03:28:28
Christ himself suffered.?

what??
By: LightPrecursor63. on 13 May 12, 11:20:28
what??

He? lives forever...
By: WeeklyBibleTalk. on 13 May 12, 03:48:15
He? lives forever...

Dawkins tries to ...
By: sylmarmusic2012. on 12 May 12, 02:08:24
Dawkins tries to make sense out of? his nonsense.

God bless? Cardinal ...
By: missdarcy321. on 12 May 12, 01:42:55
God bless? Cardinal Pell!!!! LONG LIVE CHRIST THE KING!!!!

The whole reason? ...
By: sylmarmusic2012. on 12 May 12, 01:34:44
The whole reason? for science is to find out the " how and why" of things so, for Dawkins to say you can ask the "how" but not the "why" of things is absurd.

Dawkins is? ...
By: sylmarmusic2012. on 12 May 12, 01:17:56
Dawkins is? delusional.

this so called god ...
By: flexbrat. on 11 May 12, 05:33:25
this so called god of urs is the worst delution humanity has to kill off for humanity to move on ! even today the drama that obama said gays ok to wed an all the drama if it will hurt his election in the christian community is out of this? world ! see why religion hurts ppl and their rites as humans if not ur as evil as the god of bible the same shit ! those who restrict the basic happiness of anyone is FLAWED and sick of mind an evil ! stay out of public politics etc ! its evil in nature !

dont leave peace ...
By: flexbrat. on 11 May 12, 05:26:28
dont leave peace offerings to me , offer peace offering to those in the conga the states of islamic countries who kill an kill for religious beliefs an those who die fron cancer ills starvation etc u can thank ur so called god for ur uneventfull life but tell that to all those who r now suffering.killed.as we now type? this in real time ur god is no where an doesnt ever intervene ever its OBSURD ! religous beliefs kill humanity if BEST ! go live in a 4th world country than reply !

I found peace the ...
By: flexbrat. on 11 May 12, 05:17:31
I found peace the monent at age 12 in catholic school when I asked the nuns an priests why would an all loving god want need to burn torture ppl souls in hell forever ? their reply was to send me to the corner to pray for forgiveness lol cause thats where i would go if I didnt stop asking questions ! so I researched an I founf truth that there is no gods ! then now or ever ! this priest as u said is calm well let him work? like the rest of us for a living ! the REAL WORLD ! calm he wont be !

ur god has been out ...
By: flexbrat. on 11 May 12, 05:08:27
ur god has been out of touch for centuries ! age isnt a factor in my case ! to believe in a god delution is to believe the world is still flat and the vatican still is killing ppl who dont agree w/their dogma as they have done throughout history , trying to stop the real truth of science etc ! this priest is deluded to the facts of his own faith an HORRIBLE history of faith killing those who DONT BELIEVE THEIR CRAP ! research it but u wont as ur? contented in lies !

48:08 - First ...
By: JohnnyBeGudd. on 10 May 12, 21:21:32
48:08 - First communion? But I poop from there!?

CNN Arizona Republican Presidential Debate at Mesa Arts Center - February 22, 2012
Posted by: PointZeroRed

Video duration: 6313 seconds
Global video hits: 136114

Time: 08:00 PM (20:00) EST on Wednesday, February 22nd, 2012 Location: Mesa Arts Center in Mesa, AZ Broadcast: CNN Sponers: Republican Party of Arizona and CNN Host: John King Participants: Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum, Ron Paul

Related: mitt romney, newt gingrich, rick santorum, ron paul, republican, gop, az, 2012, election, debate, john king, republican party of arizona, rpoa, mesa arts center, mesa, arizona, cnn, feb 22, february 22, february 22nd, 0222, 02222012, hd, 1080p

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

also federal ...
By: shiftas2. on 21 May 12, 04:04:39
also federal reserve is a private corporation which borrows money to the buisness which is the "usa" at an intrest rate they can never repay=lifetime slave labour to? pay off the debt they can never payback in a trillion lifetimes.

This actually ...
By: shiftas2. on 21 May 12, 03:57:21
This actually reminds me of wrestling from the music to the narration.......theyre? enemys infront of the camera....but behind it theyre friends part of the same group, give me proof ron paul isnt a shill and ill take him more serious

and also notice ...
By: noelesparza. on 20 May 12, 22:01:13
and also notice that every time? ron paul speaks he gets rushed. Everyone else talks as long as they want majority of the time

wow they also ...
By: noelesparza. on 20 May 12, 21:18:38
wow they also skipped ron paul completely? on the illegal immigrant issue. Still more BS...

Wow ron paul is not ...
By: noelesparza. on 20 May 12, 20:11:22
Wow ron paul is not even in the? picture most of the time. BS...

RON PAUL!?
By: locoxguy. on 20 May 12, 05:44:03
RON PAUL!?

At 51:40 Gengrich ...
By: FranksHarbor. on 19 May 12, 16:20:01
At 51:40 Gengrich quotes Ron Paul about government intervention in state affairs leading to tyranny. WATCH AT 52:20 WHEN THEY PUT RON PAUL'S QUOTE ON THE BOTTOM TICKER LINE AS A GINGRICH QUOTE!!! Even people who don't support Ron Paul must see these things happening!?!? As always, CNN? keeping Ron Paul out of the debate, skipping him and diverting attention to the other candidates.

what a? great ...
By: emanueltafta. on 19 May 12, 10:48:11
what a? great country contributing to what I call mafia terrorising people into doing what their government wants them to do with wars all over the world. I say it is a waist esspacially in times like this but people are ust going to wake up when a WW3 breaks up too late

Ok at the end which ...
By: emanueltafta. on 19 May 12, 10:40:54
Ok at the end which i think very few made it, war and tactics just sucks on every candidate except Ron. What, is Osama real? Are those dictators not picked up and given power by US CIA, then being overthrown by the same people? Isn'n PETROLIUM/OIL in thos "potentially dangerous and threthening" countries? Or let me be straight, isnt'n massmedia lying to people on mass about this acward and obvous kids lie? or are people so stupid to look up and learn? from the TV? I need and answear

Wow so promising ...
By: emanueltafta. on 19 May 12, 09:33:43
Wow so promising that it makes Ron Paul look outstanding on his simple healthy and efficient plans... ? rHe's the real deal, Ron's the One, the rest look like they're trying to baby sit America while it is sinking? in the ocean people

did rick perry? ...
By: molpr. on 18 May 12, 18:48:09
did rick perry? drop out??

I love how good Ron ...
By: Tyrant60. on 18 May 12, 16:40:22
I love how good Ron Paul is at a? poker face.

RON PAUL 2012?
By: chazzybadazz. on 18 May 12, 03:20:55
RON PAUL 2012?

hmmm?
By: illuminatitv. on 15 May 12, 20:34:39
hmmm?

Mitt didnt answer ...
By: music77ify. on 15 May 12, 05:29:07
Mitt didnt answer the last question....ass.?

no...Ron Paul is ...
By: music77ify. on 15 May 12, 03:15:43
no...Ron Paul is hot..you are dumb,? and have bad taste.

Blah Blah Blah Ron ...
By: bensum9111. on 14 May 12, 14:10:01
Blah Blah Blah Ron Paul speaks common sense, Blah Blah Blah, Ron Paul speaks common? sense Blah Blah Blah.

lesser? of two evils
By: eaglestudios829. on 14 May 12, 05:49:34
lesser? of two evils

by that logic? ...
By: AfroNinjaX. on 14 May 12, 05:14:50
by that logic? you're replacing one with another

LOL?
By: AfroNinjaX. on 14 May 12, 05:13:44
LOL?

lol?
By: AfroNinjaX. on 14 May 12, 05:13:29
lol?

I know everyone ...
By: eaglestudios829. on 14 May 12, 04:15:31
I know everyone wants Ron Paul. But we all know it'll be Romney. So let's all get behind him and do what we can to get? the socialist out of the White House!

Go Ron Paul!?
By: Westernairesfly. on 14 May 12, 03:02:27
Go Ron Paul!?

Raw Milk Debate - February 16, 2012
Posted by: HLSFoodLawSociety

Video duration: 5796 seconds
Global video hits: 18619

Harvard Food Law Society hosted a debate on the legal, nutritional, and safety aspects of raw milk. For more information about the Food Law Society, including each of the presenters' powerpoints go to www.foodsoc.org.

Related: raw milk

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

The United States ...
By: MrMarblemania. on 19 May 12, 22:08:35
The United States was born? and bred on RAW milk. To hell with "goverment" control. It's all about their little pea brain and contol. I will NOT obey them. I was born free and will remain so.

DRINKING RAW MILK.. ...
By: AmethystValentino. on 15 May 12, 03:52:09
DRINKING RAW MILK... SHOULD BE A PERSONAL CHOICE! I HAPPEN TO LIKE IT BETTER THEN STORE BOUGHT MILK... However it is? difficult to find in NYC.

And if you want raw ...
By: Rubystargoats. on 13 May 12, 02:01:54
And if you want raw milk...visit the farm. Are the animals clean? Healthy? Friendly? What are their udder infection rates? Does the farmer drink their own milk? How do they handle the milking and milk - from teat to jar/bottle? What do they feed the animals? How many animals do they keep, do they have a good record system on? each one? If you can find a grass/hay/forage based dairy those are the best

The thing to ask in ...
By: Rubystargoats. on 13 May 12, 01:53:31
The thing to ask in the cases of illness is, what was the immune system of the people before they started drinking raw milk. Were their systems anemic from antibiotics use and creating sterile home environments? Americans are far too concerned with being? impossibly sterile...which isn't normal! Kids are Supposed to eat dirt, and kiss animals.

FYI... E coli 0157: ...
By: Rubystargoats. on 13 May 12, 01:37:35
FYI... E coli 0157:H7 comes from the overfeeding of grain to ruminants...like cows. Which is what the pasteurized dairies and factory farms do. E coli 0157:H7 likes an acidic environment, like a grainfed cow's gut... and then your gut. Cows weren't? designed to eat grain...they eat grass when given the choice.

goddamnit I now ...
By: tfrenn. on 12 May 12, 15:21:30
goddamnit I now know why I have little balls, i DRINK? BULLSHIT MILK

@CHILDOL 199%? ...
By: TheJS2010. on 12 May 12, 07:09:48
@CHILDOL 199%? agreed and liked your comment.

@CHILDoh MAN UR ...
By: TheJS2010. on 12 May 12, 07:09:13
@CHILDoh MAN UR DEDUCTION Is? spot on.

That government ...
By: nss21heath. on 12 May 12, 05:15:34
That government lady? doesn't know a damn thing! Shii mann

95% of dairy farms ...
By: bigsugar999. on 09 May 12, 02:57:57
95% of dairy farms drink their milk raw,? so i'd be curious to see a study of the teeth of dairy farmer families vs, the gerneral pasturized drinking population.

Harvard? can't ...
By: balancex3. on 08 May 12, 09:41:29
Harvard? can't afford microphones? lol thanks for the video

I just loved the ...
By: cinnful1. on 08 May 12, 01:20:07
I just loved the lawyer's list of "International Organizations"...and his question "Do you think? that all of them are involved in a conspiracy?"....well, to answer honestly.....YES !!!! Notice he later admitted to NEVER representing a client that attempted to sue a pasteurized milk producer yet in the 80's over 100,000 people were sicked by the "safe" milk? Not bought off? MY ASS !!! Lawyers, you can tell when they're lying, their lips are moving (yes, an old joke but still true).

sell raw milk and ...
By: SGDeGalvez. on 06 May 12, 21:29:41
sell raw milk and suggest that it be cooked before consumption, like chicken. cigs kill 400k per year in the USA and our electe3d imbeciles? are scared of raw milk. go fekking figure.

Making raw milk ...
By: ChildOL. on 06 May 12, 20:03:42
Making raw milk illegal because? it may be contaminated is like making raw water illegal because it may be contaminated... It's simply irrational

Running from the ...
By: golfismness. on 05 May 12, 05:03:12
Running from the truth (for whatever reason) brands you as a little chicken-shit? in eternity! Have a nice day, little CHICKEN-SHIT! LOL!

Did they say .5% of ...
By: jterranova1. on 02 May 12, 22:22:10
Did they say .5% of 9M consumers become ill? from raw milk? I'd be curious to know the severity of the illnesses, and how this compares to # and degree of illnesses attributed to pasteurized milk. And also what are the stats w/ respect to related products - cheese, yogurt, ice cream?

Where are the food ...
By: AfterFauve001. on 29 Apr 12, 21:49:05
Where are the food police when kids are getting diabetes and learning disorders from pop rocks, sugar cereal, soda, and microwave garbage. FDA said a certain amount of "Rat Feces" in our food that comes out of the? factories - "After" being irradiated (you know - with radiation - commonly associated with cancer) is perfectly OK. - its all about money.

A lawyer talking ...
By: AfterFauve001. on 29 Apr 12, 21:35:41
A lawyer talking about honesty? - head? implodes.

France: Elections présidentielles 2012:débat Sarkozy-Hollande
Posted by: pichelline

Video duration: 8800 seconds
Global video hits: 154018

Elections présidentielles 2012:débat Sarkozy-Hollande

Related: france, politique, françois, hollande, et, nicolas, sarkozy, debat

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Offer your help? ...
By: Eve Mendes. on 21 May 12, 18:15:46
Offer your help? French people...lol. Mais Serieusement!

This is old school, ...
By: Eve Mendes. on 21 May 12, 18:13:28
This is old school, but I need a french? buddy to help me with my French. No extra extra bizarre individuals please. Merci... XD

c est grave de voir ...
By: killbill13ful. on 21 May 12, 15:23:26
c est grave de voir tous les messages qui sont axés sur les races et les religions c est bien vous avez bien brouté ce que l on a bien voulu vous donner !!!! ?

bas les masques tu ...
By: killbill13ful. on 21 May 12, 15:13:23
bas les masques tu n habite pas en israël et tu n as pas 39 ans sinon ça serait grave à? ton age de débiter sur chaque vidéo que tu regardes "antisémite" et "goyim" bref je parie que tu as 16 ans et que tu vis en france .

Vous pouvez dire ce ...
By: xWhiteShooteRx. on 20 May 12, 12:58:59
Vous pouvez dire ce que vous voulez, mais lorsqu'un un homme, qui est à l'heure actuelle président de la République et qui répond à la question de Sarkozy lorsque ce dernier demande : Quel pays d'Europe a fait mieux la France depuis 2009 ? C'est honteux que Monsieur Hollande réponde? : Les Etats-Unis. Je souhaite bonne chance à mes compatriotes, vous en aurez besoin... Ps dans les deux pays maintenant :s

The French were ...
By: DrStrangebomb1993. on 20 May 12, 11:05:37
The French were really tricked by that socialistHollande... he promised a lot and now even international media says he won't be able to keep his promises. Was Greece not enough of an indicator? France is done for, at least Sarkozy was enough of a patriot not to dig its grave willingly.?

rendez-vous dans 10 ...
By: 22ARTO. on 19 May 12, 21:34:15
rendez-vous dans 10 ans ?

incroyable, ...
By: sabra06. on 19 May 12, 19:46:17
incroyable, empêcher? les? gens d être libre dans un pays de liberté cela n arrive qu'aux musulmans

mdr?
By: chaldeene95. on 18 May 12, 21:56:14
mdr?

continu? a rêver sa ...
By: sabra06. on 18 May 12, 19:54:55
continu? a rêver sa donne l'espoir

Bien dit ! :p?
By: sebbb29. on 18 May 12, 15:28:04
Bien dit ! :p?

FleurDeLys1234 ton ...
By: Clément Blanchard. on 18 May 12, 14:04:25
FleurDeLys1234 ton d'abord les arabes il vont retourner chez eux a grand cou dans le cul, qu'ils retournent dans leur pays et qu'ils nous fasse pas chier. Ils font? la loi chez eux mais pas en France!

tout à, fait ...
By: chaldeene95. on 18 May 12, 11:59:10
tout à, fait d'accord N.S parle l'argement? mieux que hollande

hollande tu es trop ...
By: sabra06. on 18 May 12, 11:36:07
hollande tu es trop fort? tu as mis sarko a la poubelle? pour 5 ans et peut être grâce a toi on va plus voir sa tronche

bravo tu as gagné, ...
By: sabra06. on 18 May 12, 11:21:49
bravo tu as gagné, tout le monde croit que tu es un? arabe, normale la plus part sur se blog sont comme toi FN ou UMP . mais bon arrêtez de mettre des bombes en corse, en plus vous les mettez chez les français pas chez les arabes.

arrete de faire ...
By: Audrey Leatitia. on 18 May 12, 09:57:42
arrete de faire chier le monde , nous ont part pas de notre pays c'est toi qui? va retourner dans ton pays

Tu est? sorti de ...
By: sebbb29. on 17 May 12, 20:40:06
Tu est? sorti de l'hopital?

tu te rend fou ...
By: sabra06. on 17 May 12, 20:00:23
tu te rend fou surtout et tu te ridiculise après? tu dis que tu as gagné , oui tu as surtout gagné la folie

Moi je pas insulté ...
By: FleurDeLys1234. on 17 May 12, 19:54:08
Moi je pas insulté ALLAH toi tu fumer trop de bédo JE SUIS ARABE toi tu est petite froncaise qui pue ,nous on vout nik vos race je croit cet moi? qui te rond fou, tu peut pu te passé de moi tu a bien vus BIENTOT LE CHARIA DANS LE FRONCE INCH ALLAH DIEU ET GRONT

tu me fais rire il ...
By: sabra06. on 17 May 12, 19:44:25
tu me fais rire il y a pas longtemps tu insulter allah et aujourd hui tu l aime c est bien pour les musulmans ça un facho qui dit dieu et grand tu as raison il et grand la preuve regarde toi . tu es petit pour moi très petit et je te rend? fou allez dis allah akbar c est jolie venant de toi

mais pourquoi tu es ...
By: Audrey Leatitia. on 17 May 12, 19:22:24
mais pourquoi tu es mechant on t'a rien? fait

t trop marant!!!!? ...
By: Audrey Leatitia. on 17 May 12, 19:21:26
t trop marant!!!!? mais ca fait pitié

bientot le ...
By: FleurDeLys1234. on 17 May 12, 19:18:59
bientot le présidont il va etre arabe et il va foutre tout les blan? dehors

li zarabe il zaime ...
By: FleurDeLys1234. on 17 May 12, 19:16:48
li zarabe il zaime bien hollonde, il s'ont besoin de lui pour envayir le pays et foutre les sale froncais ban? dehors INCH ALLAH

en plus je me ...
By: Audrey Leatitia. on 17 May 12, 19:08:11
en plus je me demandes qui voterais pour? lui!!!!

$All Of Ron Paul\$

All Of Ron Paul's Responses At The ABC Iowa GOP Debate
Posted by: SaveOurSovereignty3

Video duration: 800 seconds
Global video hits: 383391

Airing Date December.11, 2011, DailyMotion Link www.dailymotion.com All Of Ron Paul's Responses At The ABC Iowa GOP Debate

Related: iowa, debate, abc, gop, ron paul, interview, cain, mitt romney, perry, obama, bush, federal reserve, bernanke, geithner, president, 2012, dollar

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

obama sended troops ...
By: VGTheater. on 18 May 12, 00:39:38
obama sended troops to australia,im not sure about the reason why,but remenber,where ever the US military lands,they never never? never leave.

Noam? Chomsky
By: Henrichs2. on 16 May 12, 16:25:27
Noam? Chomsky

my god i love RON ...
By: flex2125. on 13 May 12, 04:05:43
my god i love RON PAUL.?

Nothing is free? ...
By: diamonddayv. on 10 May 12, 23:01:56
Nothing is free? Bullshit! Just because you don't give a shit about those less? fortunate doesn't mean the rest of us don't.

@DrJakeGreenstreet ...
By: theCRMartin11. on 08 May 12, 22:59:56
@DrJakeGreenstreet you must be from Canada and have bought into the public school propaganda that free healthcare is good. Before free healthcare prices were cheaper relatively to today's prices, everyone still recieved emergency care. Through charity and giving. And health care was more accessible and efficient. I live in Canada myself, but I know its a way to? drive up taxes and increase government. Fuck "free" healthcare.

@DrJakeGreenstreet ...
By: theCRMartin11. on 08 May 12, 22:56:26
@DrJakeGreenstreet listen to Ron Paul talk about healthcare he explains perfectly why forced healthcare "not free". Nothing is free. Limits choice, and does not? allow for competition and for the free market to prosper. It controls prices. Ron Paul suggests that if the health service industry is allowed to operate more freely and that includes insurance companies especially. It will encourage competition and better prices and more efficient care.

The Rothschild- ...
By: westernvoices5. on 17 Apr 12, 23:14:33
The Rothschild-owned lying media insists that Asia? is for the Asians, Africa is for the Africans, but White countries are for everybody!! They say the "White Advantage" problem, which? allegedly exists inside every White Nation, will ONLY be solved when non-white people from the 3rd world immigrate & displace the founding European population!!! For a FREE informative booklet & video on the Zionist-engineered INTENTIONAL destruction of White people go to: w w w. youtube. com/watch?v=n663eVTSyS8

because? it's not ...
By: XSquibX. on 10 Apr 12, 02:39:16
because? it's not free for those of us who pay taxes -.- It's only free for the idiots who don't work.

3:44 newt? winks ...
By: venturamack. on 05 Apr 12, 13:39:40
3:44 newt? winks cause he knows its true

100%? agree
By: ElHasZardo. on 03 Apr 12, 09:12:33
100%? agree

I'm not losing hope ...
By: LagmonX. on 01 Apr 12, 03:09:34
I'm not losing hope mon~> But i'm prepared for the? worst.

pack? your bags
By: ohno2121212. on 01 Apr 12, 02:51:18
pack? your bags

Because nothing is ...
By: nitrouspurger. on 30 Mar 12, 16:37:27
Because nothing is free...?

The world needs ...
By: stheodorus. on 29 Mar 12, 00:29:19
The world needs peace? friends.

Ron? Paul . . . ...
By: NexusVerbal. on 28 Mar 12, 05:16:03
Ron? Paul . . . BRINGING DOWN THE HOUSE

My understanding? ...
By: DrJakeGreenstreet. on 27 Mar 12, 19:48:15
My understanding? is that the American people don't like Obama because he wants to form a free health service. Why?

He got my? vote
By: soldier8202. on 27 Mar 12, 14:01:34
He got my? vote

True, but in his ...
By: EnslavedAndOppressed. on 27 Mar 12, 04:05:34
True, but in his monologues he sounds better (assuming he has the right Teleprompt) . In? Q&A Paul rules. I think Obama can give better monologues, though........

Obama says "uh" ...
By: robertwilkerson13. on 27 Mar 12, 03:14:23
Obama says "uh" more than Ron Paul lol?

Richard Nixon, in ...
By: EnslavedAndOppressed. on 26 Mar 12, 22:12:57
Richard Nixon, in his book "Leaders", said that management was like prose and leadership was like poetry..... If Paul could refine out the "uh's" and speak more smoothly, I think he would hold a better chance at? gaining the presidency. I think it's a shame that people are swept up by catchy phrases and creative graphics, rather than reason......

Well let's put ...
By: Bruce Leeroy. on 26 Mar 12, 20:00:48
Well let's put anotha shrimp on tha? barbe! Come January 2012.

Shes atrocious? xs
By: Shinji575. on 25 Mar 12, 02:29:34
Shes atrocious? xs

I feel as though ...
By: LagmonX. on 23 Mar 12, 18:49:13
I feel as though America would be smarter but i guess? the only smart ones are the ones the government pays.

it's almost? as if ...
By: 4444key. on 22 Mar 12, 23:46:21
it's almost? as if he controled this debate

unfortunetly, too ...
By: XMailer9. on 22 Mar 12, 14:31:36
unfortunetly, too many people have the mentality of your friends,? and that's why the US is fcuked but i hope not.

$Tunisia debates religion\$

Tunisia debates religion's role in new constitution
Posted by: AlJazeeraEnglish

Video duration: 2294 seconds
Global video hits: 2559

What role should religion play in the new constitution? We look at the growing debate between secularist and conservatives in Tunisia.

Related: thestream, youtube, aljazeera

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

CAPITALISM creates ...
By: koppellhinex. on 09 Apr 12, 04:47:38
CAPITALISM creates DRUG LORDS. LAWYERS. BANKERS. ELITE? CRIMINALS. INEQUALITY. INSECURITY. GREED. RUTHLESS COMMUNISM. NWO. NAZI. TERRORISM. LAZY PEOPLE. REBEL POLITICIAN. ANARCHY. worst is WAR etc.. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? CAPITALISM was designed only for CORRUPT OPPORTUNISTIC MANIPULATIVE LAZY POLITICIAN. BANKERS. NARCOPOLITICIAN. JUDGES. CRIMINALS. DICTATORS. RULERS. KING. SULTANATE. EMPEROR etc.. HARD WORKING PEACE LOVING HAPPY HONEST SOCIETY were always the slave victim and poorly starve to death. :(

Secularism will ...
By: StarChunks. on 03 Apr 12, 23:37:49
Secularism will always triumph? over superstition.

long live ...
By: KaKaGaNu. on 03 Apr 12, 08:53:50
long live secularism, fuck off religious fanatics?

You must live in ...
By: Mathenaut. on 30 Mar 12, 22:54:14
You must live in Bangladesh then. That is a pretty liberal exception to the muslim world, given that Islam is simply a religion? respected for cultural influence. No sharia law or radical nutjobs or anything that takes the religion too seriously. Sadly, your exception does not break the rule. Malaysia allows freedom of religion, Turkey is surprisingly secular, and Lebannon has an abyssmal human rights record - as is usual for most that are strict with Islam.

lol? no kidding
By: Redfingers. on 30 Mar 12, 18:52:39
lol? no kidding

long? live islam, ...
By: bahriboy. on 30 Mar 12, 17:26:00
long? live islam, not the disease that is wahhabism\salafiyah. i'm for an islamic regime..i am for an eventual caliphate..but ALL these main 'islamic' groups are fraudulent to me..as their history (& present..look at saudi) shows.

nahda is ...
By: infinitedimension1. on 30 Mar 12, 16:39:46
nahda is corrupt.long? live salafiyyah

Laptop? on lap . ...
By: bicyclexx7. on 30 Mar 12, 14:35:14
Laptop? on lap . Unknown EMF dangers .

As a white European ...
By: MrFattyfatfatboy. on 30 Mar 12, 10:59:05
As a white European who lives in the new world i think we should get down on our hands and knees and thank God or Allah that Islam took over the whole middle east.Could you imagine the Arabs,hiers to Carthage and Egypt who? invented civilisation as we know it,built Pyramids and sailed the world while we were a barbaric bunch of caveman ever falling behind us without this religion to topple cripple thier traders and scientist.If you dont believe me,try playing bridge against a Arab,no white wins.

You're not very ...
By: GluttonForSex. on 30 Mar 12, 10:11:31
You're not very bright, are you?? :-)

religion is brain ...
By: SL4yb. on 30 Mar 12, 08:32:20
religion is brain disease? a mental worm

i think its to ...
By: abdullah94100. on 30 Mar 12, 08:03:10
i think its to early to? blame the government about the economic development..the most important right now is transperancy...

There are 2 ...
By: HenryDavidT. on 30 Mar 12, 07:29:32
There are 2 societies in the ME that use 6th century Sharia Law. Few people FLOCK to Saudi Arabia & Iran as places of? peace, prosperity, vacation, happiness, tolerance, enlightenment, etc. They are able to mask a lot of their impoverity & ugliness through a deluge of cash & technologies imported from the West; but in 50 years, when their oil fields are dry, except for ignorant & intolerant Moslems for superstitious pilgrimage, few would travel to either country for any reason...

Im Muslim and ...
By: boxing101foo. on 30 Mar 12, 07:27:59
Im Muslim and nationalism is horrible. YOUR NOT TUNISIAN YOUR MUSLIM !!! divide and conquer you silly arabs ! your an embarrassment to the? Muslim world !

No religious ...
By: mathematics64. on 30 Mar 12, 07:21:04
No religious influence anywhere? in politics. Religion is a cancer.

Nobody wants to ...
By: Hirnlego999. on 30 Mar 12, 07:04:03
Nobody wants to live in a religions prison. Ben Ali? was enough.

I feel sorry for ...
By: Hirnlego999. on 30 Mar 12, 07:02:16
I feel sorry for you. The great flying spaghetti monstah will boil unbelievers in spaghetti? sauce, which the believers will then consume at his blessing. Ramen.

What's the problem ...
By: Hirnlego999. on 30 Mar 12, 07:01:13
What's the problem with divorce? It happens more in the western countries because even women? can choose to end it. No point in staying in something which causes misery.

What's the problem ...
By: Hirnlego999. on 30 Mar 12, 07:01:05
What's the problem with divorce? It happens more in the western countries because even women can choose? to end it. No point in staying in something which causes misery.

Nothing wrong with ...
By: Hirnlego999. on 30 Mar 12, 06:59:53
Nothing wrong with cutting of hands? You just demonstrate how? religion creates delusional people. Very few religions give women decent rights.

Science isn't ...
By: Hirnlego999. on 30 Mar 12, 06:58:28
Science isn't arrogant. Nothing goes? through as a rigorous testing procedure as science. I wish the same could be said about religion. But those "holy" books do not even come with footnotes.

Religion? poisons ...
By: Hirnlego999. on 30 Mar 12, 06:53:41
Religion? poisons everything.

"In my society", ...
By: RafaelFernandeSantos. on 30 Mar 12, 04:04:49
"In my society", the President is a woman, women go to college in rates higher? than men's, have the freedom to choose their careers and lifestyle, and according to polls we're more likely than any society to say women would make a positive contribution to political life. And btw, according to polls, people in Muslim countries such as Lebanon, Turkey and Malaysia, are more likely than Americans to say that marriage is best when both husband and wife provide for the family.

YOU ARE NOT ...
By: WinkyMaeve. on 30 Mar 12, 03:44:03
YOU ARE NOT TUNISIAN. YOU HAVE NO SAY IN THE MATTER. ARROGANT KNOW? IT ALL AMERICAN CUNT.

Republican Chokes Up At Gay Marriage Debate In Washington
Posted by: BuzzFeed

Video duration: 240 seconds
Global video hits: 1496796

Latest comments made on this video:

This speech is ...
By: luke83rj. on 20 May 12, 23:28:42
This speech is totally amazing. Some homophobes should start to realize that there are gays in their families or among their friends, and some probably are just too afraid to come out. And when they say all those insulting things, it can hurt someone who is very close. Is it human to say? some cruel things, to not accept someone for who he is? Gay people just want to be free and be who they really are, they demand respect and equal rights.

@jyhwkrhs1223 thank ...
By: acchokiefan. on 18 May 12, 05:30:19
@jyhwkrhs1223 thank you. Homosexuals represent about? 3% of the population, yet there are 180,000,000 who support them. Many of us are standing up for a minority against this crazy Christian nastiness. Christ loves and welcomes gays and loathes republicans. I can feel it. I will cast my vote for the only Christian running for president. Obama? in November and just leave stupid standing there wondering where their half empty beer is.

So... America ...
By: iFukuyama. on 15 May 12, 11:46:16
So... America legalized marrying inanimate objects and ideas before people of the same gender? Or is it just that that sort of stuff hasn't been outlawed, but same-sex marriage has had a law written just to prevent it??

I doubt? that
By: darthmath2. on 15 May 12, 01:37:51
I doubt? that

I think you mix up ...
By: Montesama314. on 14 May 12, 23:30:40
I think you mix up the Supreme Court's strict scrutiny "1)only means" to fulfill "2)compelling interest" requirements with the rational basis test, which only needs "legitimate interest". If the Court used strict scrutiny, Proposal 8 surely wouldn't survive. But while a state always has legitimate interest in public safety, the rational basis test also calls for "reasonable means" to fulfill the purpose. Keeping the? public safe by barring people's marriages doesn't sound "reasonable" to me.

A lot of informal ...
By: Montesama314. on 14 May 12, 22:59:48
A lot of informal comments on the web complain about "letting sexual deviants run wild" or "they can't marry because marriage is about having kids", or something similar. But those critics get marriage confused with sex. Clearly, any idiot can have sex (and any man can engage in sodomy [anal/oral sex] with a? woman and vice versa), regardless of marriage status. Otherwise, unplanned pregnancy and adultery wouldn't exist. This issue isn't about sex, it's about equal rights for consenting adults.

What the hell are ...
By: Montesama314. on 14 May 12, 22:50:13
What the hell are you talking about, "Christians are second class citizens"? Christianity is all over the place, if you haven't figured it out by Christian TV programs, gigantic churches--hell, "In God We Trust" is on money! Straight Christians can? marry, straight Jews can marry, etc. Why not homosexuals of those religions? Gay marriage's legalization just expands marriage's benefits. After blacks had voting rights, whites didn't lose their voting rights and become second-class, did they?

I'm crying right? ...
By: tylerfrump15. on 14 May 12, 16:03:23
I'm crying right? now.

An atheist, Jew, ...
By: 1000specs. on 14 May 12, 13:35:48
An atheist, Jew, Hindu or any other person Christians believe are going to hell for eternity are able to get married in any church. But you wish gays cannot? Do you wish to have "religious freedom" and not allow all of those different? religions and different people to get married in a particular church? Or just the latter party?

Ahh, she should ...
By: DeeJay1970. on 13 May 12, 13:23:49
Ahh, she should have left the bit about her daughter out? of her speech. Now everyone thinks she only changed her views because of that. Unfortunately, not every legislator or family has an out & proud gay person in their family to help change the mind of the bigoted.

Common sense 101 ...
By: pier456. on 13 May 12, 05:17:52
Common sense 101 Only reason gays are fighting for gay marriage is to avoid being classified as a mentally diseased person by trying? to fool people in believing is natural to? be a gay. Why? Because no one wants to be classified as a diseased person... Only reason the government is? going to legalize gay marriage is so they can pocket that tax money from you tools and again when you get divorced.

republicans? want ...
By: patarfuyfuy. on 11 May 12, 13:42:20
republicans? want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers!

You are in fact the ...
By: jyhwkrhs1223. on 11 May 12, 08:05:30
You are in fact the coward. You hide behind the anonymity the internet to lash out with your hatred for people that are different from you. As a straight American, I believe that it is incumbent as human beings to stand up for the rights of the minority. That is our duty as as Christians, to stand up for the oppressed. It's a shame in the progressive society we live in that there are still people that believe that granting homosexuals the right to marry is a violation of their religious? freedom

Maureen Walsh, ...
By: OutRunr47. on 11 May 12, 03:26:14
Maureen Walsh, you're a coward. You just killed religious freedom in Washington state, made all Christians in Washington 2nd class citizens, and the absolute worst of all you now force churches to perform same-sex weddings? under threat of lawsuits, severe fines, and jail for all who still believe in marriage between one man and one woman.

OBAMA, RULER OF ...
By: NextLevelEnt1. on 11 May 12, 03:25:22
OBAMA, RULER OF NATIONS / VOTE OBAMA 2012 The 44th President of the United States of America "BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA" The greatest black man... that ever lived! NEXT LEVEL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS WORLDWIDE VOTE OBAMA 2012 REV. 16:16 There will be "nowhere to hide" once Israel is attacked! God's... promise to man! The battle... begins. OBAMA, was born for this very day! The "Son Of Man" is coming home to where it begun, JERUSALEM. OBAMA, RULER? OF NATIONS VOTE OBAMA 2012

@audiogek took the ...
By: acchokiefan. on 11 May 12, 02:23:47
@audiogek took the words out of my mouth. A republican showing compassion and having the courage to show it. You know, in my own self centerdness, site I'm for gay? rights, but it's not my highest priority. But when I think about how this could actually harm someone or deny someone. It pisses me off. And uck the republicans, they don't care who they hurt, they don't care who they deny, they don't care who gets killed unless its somebody who isn't fucking alive. The start wars, they block healthc

if your against gay ...
By: jayrockwell33. on 10 May 12, 10:46:50
if your against gay rights, equal rights, regardless in all aspects that pretty much just makes you - a nazi. grow up you? fundamentalist fuckers.

People like this? ...
By: lilyannzhang. on 10 May 12, 06:41:14
People like this? who make the world a better place :)

well said! ...
By: ghettosupastar001. on 08 May 12, 23:43:22
well said! beautiful speech/appeal!?

"i dont miss the ...
By: Killerjosh89. on 08 May 12, 07:40:51
"i dont miss the sex...i mean, i certainly miss it" lmao. same here, mam.?

Amen. True wisdom ...
By: 3investigators. on 07 May 12, 21:57:55
Amen. True wisdom well expressed.?

A politician with ...
By: audiogek. on 06 May 12, 11:47:50
A politician with actual feelings......this must be fake? !!

I really love ...
By: theassortedjellybean. on 06 May 12, 04:57:05
I really love lesbian porn so I can't hate on gay? guys cuz that would make me hippocritical. saying "LESBIANS ARE OKAY AND BISEXUAL GIRLS ARE AWESOME BUT NOT BI GUYS OR HOMOS" anyone who says that is retarded. You reject it all or accept it all.

God Bless this ...
By: MrHeythere24. on 04 May 12, 14:38:03
God Bless this woman!!!?

Well? said.
By: McSuperfly5. on 02 May 12, 17:22:40
Well? said.

$Christine O\$

Christine O'Donnell on the Constitution (go to 7:03, 2:37, 3:35) fameappeal.com
Posted by: FameAppeal

Video duration: 481 seconds
Global video hits: 1053036

Christine O'Donnell and the bill of rights, Via: www.fameappeal.com Go to 2:37, 7:03, 3:35 For Fame Appeal Articlebit.ly clip was taken october 18 2010, in my law school's court room. To the left is Democrat Chris Coons, to the right is Tea Party candidate Christine O'donnell -topics; first amendment, church v. state

Related: first amendment, church state seperation, christine odonnell, widener, university, odonnell, ignorant of constitution

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

OMG......When it ...
By: mphs95. on 08 May 12, 15:54:46
OMG......When it comes to the Constitution, O'Donnell is an idiot! She thought she was all Miss Thing when she called out Mr. Coons on his "ignorance" to the Constitution's doctrine on religion but doesn't know what the amendments entail? One who spouts knowledge of this important document should know not only what they are, but what each spell? out. Mr Coons was smart...why argue when his opponent can dig her own hole w/ her ignorance. Rhetoric can only go so far in a debate

Evolution's not the ...
By: lovelessari. on 26 Apr 12, 02:41:36
Evolution's not the same as atheism. You can be affiliated with religion, but? still believe in the theory of evolution.

What about the ...
By: mrfunnyperson100. on 22 Mar 12, 21:10:42
What about the Supremacy? Clause? "It assures that the Constitution and federal laws and treaties take precedence over state law" I would think under that, states wouldn't be allowed to interfere with religion either.

That guy deserves a ...
By: MrHaggis03. on 20 Mar 12, 16:12:04
That guy deserves a medal for not bursting out laughing at the stupidity of every word? that came out of her mouth.

yes, true to that, ...
By: mex1jvr. on 19 Mar 12, 20:53:01
yes, true to that, Coons should? have referred it as a clause.

Bill of Rights: ...
By: dathomasii. on 12 Mar 12, 16:19:04
Bill of Rights: Congress shall make no law...Congress? isn't the Federal Government, they are made up of the States. The States made the Federal Government. This isn't saying the government can't be involved with religion at all, it just means Congress can't make a law that interferes with religious beliefs...or even a lack thereof. Nowhere do the words "separation of church and state" appear. Read your Federalist Papers.

OMG. How did this ...
By: robyz250. on 04 Mar 12, 15:04:27
OMG. How did this Women even get to this point ? She is an Idiot? !

You do realize that ...
By: happystance9able. on 29 Jan 12, 22:26:01
You do realize that nearly 100% of ALL scientists once had a geocentric worldview; that Galileo was once a minority of 1, opposed by scientists who had their entire careers invested in? Galileo's ideas being dismissed out of hand. Go read the Climategate emails and get back to me.

You do? realize 98% ...
By: mrfunnyperson100. on 26 Jan 12, 20:29:20
You do? realize 98% of ALL scientists believe global warming exsists and caused by humans.

In fairness, the ...
By: Libertarian4Liberty. on 11 Jan 12, 21:14:14
In fairness, the Constitution does not? say separation of church and state... It just says you cannot make a LAW to support or forbid a religion.

"Congress shall? ...
By: Noktirnal. on 09 Jan 12, 21:42:18
"Congress shall? make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." Must be considered as binding. That is my point. You want to put words in my mouth. I have the right to be Atheist, Muslim, Buddhist, Christian, Rastafari, etc any place anytime and practice openly

Yes, and that what ...
By: Noktirnal. on 09 Jan 12, 21:35:33
Yes, and that what I am saying. If government can tell us we can't be educated about a religion, then it might as well be telling you what religion you must belong to. Constitutional Law isn't the issue. The Constitution? is so clear in its language in this matter that any person literate in the English language should be able to understand it. ""Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;..."

I really wish that ...
By: lovegun001. on 09 Jan 12, 16:58:28
I really wish that Constitutional Law was taught in high school. So much ignorance prevails on the subject, it's troubling. Do you really not see the importance of keeping our government from deciding? what religion we practice and from taking any role in the religions education of our children? Your way of thinking is so backwards and counter to the current state of the law that I won't even try to have a serious conversation with you on the matter. I suggest you do some reading.

Your point? Are ...
By: lovegun001. on 09 Jan 12, 16:48:59
Your point? Are you really saying that case law is not binding?? LOL!

I agree that you ...
By: Noktirnal. on 09 Jan 12, 08:21:04
I agree that you are King. But you are your only subject. Our Constitution is supposed to guarantee the sovereignty? of each and every person bound by the laws of the government it creates. The Constitution limits government, not citizens. It seems government wants to bypass those limitations by passing laws that unconstitutionally limit sovereign citizens.

then why not remove ...
By: Noktirnal. on 09 Jan 12, 08:16:10
then why not remove fiction from literature classes as? well?

I don't support or ...
By: Noktirnal. on 09 Jan 12, 08:14:56
I don't support or condemn any religion over any other. Any true education system should allow students to pursue learning. In public colleges and universities, one can enroll in classes that teach about Islam, Christianity, and any number of other religions. Educating oneself about a religion does not necessarily mean you subscribe to, believe in, or are converting to that religion. A religion CAN be taught about in such a way as not to proselytize students. ?

Congress passing ...
By: Noktirnal. on 09 Jan 12, 08:07:41
Congress passing laws that restrict a student's or teacher's free exercise of religion is persecuting religion. Just as congress deciding what religions the govt. recognizes is.? Maybe they should recognize Atheism as a religion also. Then evangelical atheists could get the same treatment. Do Buddhists get persecuted for meditating in school? What about Muslims? Rastafaris? União do Vegetal? Religious persecution under color of law comes in many forms.

Judges and Justices ...
By: Noktirnal. on 09 Jan 12, 07:59:37
Judges and Justices can only rule on LAWS enacted by CONGRESS. If congress passes any law regarding religion, it is? unconstitutional, null, and void. Therefore any changes to the law based on court rulings are also null and void. The Constitution, the Supreme Law of the Land, is quite clear in its language. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;..."

Why is that CUNT ...
By: jrwbtw. on 21 Dec 11, 14:16:46
Why is that CUNT smiling? Hey, stupid bitch: They are laughing AT you! They are bowled over with your ignorance and stupidity not just of the constitution but of your ignorance at not knowing when the entire audience? laughs at your brainless stupidity. Go home and use your vibrator on its highest setting, you stupid bitch!

O'Donnell wants to ...
By: THEINVENTABLETHREAT. on 02 Dec 11, 12:46:08
O'Donnell wants to make teaching creationism in schools a federal mandate? so her argument is null and void.

LOL Well, I'll end ...
By: happystance8able. on 04 Oct 11, 01:14:10
LOL Well, I'll end by saying that you are a charming person and it amuses me that you can't comprehend why our Founders--the most brilliant philosophers who ever lived--would have chosen the words "Congress shall make no law" to serve as the subject, verb and object of the 1st Amendment. Why you think a KKK lawyer should rewrite the amendment is beyond me but I want you to know that I love you as a person? and wish you a wonderful, fulfilling life and I mean that most sincerely.

You've fallen off ...
By: lovegun001. on 03 Oct 11, 19:46:35
You've fallen off the sanity wagon again. I thought you were moving past your delusions of the state of the law and that? I had managed to educate and enlighten you. Your refusal to recognize well established legal precedent and the reality of the current state of the law makes it impossible to have an intelligent conversation with you. Further, your apparent lack of understanding our governmental structure and function makes it difficult to explain the law to you. I give up.

Teachers are not ...
By: happystance8able. on 03 Oct 11, 17:46:16
Teachers are not laws made by Congress, so they are unable to violate the 1st Amendment. Only laws made by Congress can violate it. If a law funding schools means that teachers are forbidden from teaching religious beliefs, then it is that school funding? that violates the 1st Amendment; not the teachers. Teachers are explicitly protected by the Amendment to teach religious beliefs in schools. That bothered the KKK to no end, so their lawyer, Hugo Black, struck down the 1st Amendment.

>>[teachers] ...
By: happystance8able. on 03 Oct 11, 17:41:21
>>[teachers] teaching religion in their class

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40

Health Videos

Search

Health Related Videos

Health Sponsors